Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to determine shell atomic energy related How finding Rydberg Constanta. This research was be held on Deparment of Chemistry Medan State University. Through Anorganic teaching and learning integrated with multimedia practikum, several misconception in atomic structure atomic has been overcome. The Efectivity of Multimedia Practicum in Atomic Structure for Overcoming Students Misconception Anorganic Chemistry. This research try to present discussion direct material in Inorganic Chemistry include atomic structure. The result of this research shows that there is skill student improving in learning atomic structure because of misconception trhough Rydberg’s role and occuring hydrogeen spectrum from the fourth step.

 

ABSTRAK

Tujuan penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk memperoleh informasi tentang kemampuan inquiry mahasiswa dalam menelusuri bagaimana para pakar kimiawan menemukan tetapan Rydberg sehingga tidak terjadi miskonsepsi dalam memahami struktur atom khususnya dan Kimia Anorganik pada umumnya. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Jurusan Kimia FMIPA UNIMED dengan mengintegrasikan praktikum multimedia dan pembelajaran Kimia Anorganik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan.terdapat peningkatan pemahaman mahasiswa dalam mempelajari struktur atom karena miskonsepsi terhadap tetapan Rydberg dan pembentukan spektrum Hidrogen dari ke empat ligan teratasi.

Article Details

How to Cite
Retno, S. D., & Sugyarto, S. (2011). Efektifitas Praktikum Multimedia Struktur Atom dalam Mengatasi Miskonsepsi Kimia Anorganik Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 17(5), 554-564. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v17i5.48

References

  1. Azhar, L. 1993. Proses Belajar Mengajar Pola CBSA, Usaha Nasional, Surabaya.
  2. Barke, Al Hazhari, Siretsi Barek. 2009. Misconceptions in Chemistry, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
  3. Bodner, G. M., “Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge”, Journal of Chemical Education, 1986, 63, 873 – 878.
  4. Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2002. Psikologi Belajar, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta
  5. “IKIP Yogya. 1997. http: // www. yahoo.com // Praktikum (Accessed February 2011).
  6. Roestiyah, N.K. 1998. Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Penerbit Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
  7. Creswell W. John. 1994. Research Design, Sage Publications, New Delhi
  8. Sawrey, B. A., “Concept Learning versus Problem Solving”, Journal of Chemical Education, 1990, 67, 253 - 254
  9. Suyanti D Retno. 2006. Pembekalan Kemampuan Generik Bagi Calon Guru Melalui Pembelajaran Kimia Anorganik Berbasis Multimedia Komputer, Disertasi, SPS UPI, tidak diterbitkan.
  10. Sugyarto. H K., dan Suyanti; DR. 2011. Kimia Anorganik on Logam, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
  11. Nakhleh, M.B. 1992. “Why Some Students Don’t Learn hemistry : Chemical Misconceptions”. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 191-196.
  12. Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B. 1986. Learning How to earn, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  13. Peterson, R.F., and Treagust, D.F. 1989 “Grade-12 tudents’ Misconseptions of Covalent Bonding and Structure”. Journal of Chemical Education , 66, 459-460.
  14. Sagala, Saiful. 2005. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran, lfabeta, Bandung.
  15. De Vos, W., and Verdonk, A.H. 1987. “A New Road to eactions”, The Substance and Its Molecules. Journal of hemical Education, 64, 692-694.