Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 1303 Download : 901

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk megetahui bagaimana respon dan pendapat para pendidik mengenai fitur Pelatihan Mandiri pada Platform Merdeka Mengajar. Lima aspek yang diteliti meliputi kemudahan akses, tampilan, konten/materi, keterampilan, dan kebermanfaatan. Metode penelitian berupa statistik deskriptif dengan teknik pengambilan data survei melalui kuesioner tertutup dengan menggunakan skala Likert. Subjek penelitian adalah pendidik di Sekolah Penggerak yang telah menerapkan Kurikulum Merdeka di Kepulauan Riau. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa fitur Pelatihan Mandiri bagi para penggunanya mudah diakses, tampilan dapat menfasilitasi gaya belajar, topik yang disediakan beragam dan relevan dengan kebutuhan, memberikan kemudahan dalam menyelesaikan aksi nyata, dan membantu mendapatkan pemahaman utuh terkait implementasi kurikulum Merdeka. Dengan demikian, fitur Pelatihan Mandiri efektif digunakan sebagai platform pembelajaran mandiri untuk memahami dan mengimplementasikan Kurikulum Merdeka

Keywords

Fitur Pelatihan Mandiri Platform Merdeka Mengajar Kurikulum Merdeka Sekolah Penggerak andragogi

Article Details

How to Cite
Liana, M., Fitriyah, D., Hindrasti, N. E. K., Nevrita, N., Siregar , E. F. S., & Izzati, N. (2023). Pemanfaatan Fitur Pelatihan Mandiri untuk Memahami Kurikulum Merdeka . Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 8(2), 138 - 152. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v8i2.3872

References

  1. El-Amin, A. (2020). Andragogy: A theory in practice in higher education. JRHE: Journal of Research in Higher Education, 4(2), 54–71. doi.org/10.24193/jrhe.2020.2.4
  2. Akour, M. & Alenezi, M. (2022). Higher education future in the era of digital transformation. Education Sciences, 12(11), 1-13. doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110784
  3. Amador, J.M., Kosko, K.W., Weston, T., & Estapa, A. (2021). Prospective teachers’ appraisals of technology platforms: Comparing perception and complexity. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(3), 473–489. doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1915372
  4. Apuke, O.D. (2017). Quantitative research methods/ : A synopsis approach. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 6(11), 40–47. doi.org/10.12816/0040336
  5. Asrori, Suryani, N., & Drajati, N.A. (2021). Development of animation video on youtube channels as an alternative learning media during the covid-19 pandemic. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(3), 285–294. doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v23i3.23679
  6. Azwar, S. (2019). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4 ed.). Pustaka Pelajar. Blackley, S. & Sheffield, R. (2015). Digital andragogy: A richer blend of initial teacher education in the on-line Inquiry View project developing pre-service teachers’ professional identity View project. Issues in Educational Research, 25(4). https://www.researchgate.net/
  7. publication/288841328
  8. Brame, C.J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6.1-es6.6. doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
  9. Calderón-Garrido, D., Carrera, X., & Gustems-Carnicer, J. (2021). Music education teachers’ knowledge and use of ICT at spanish universities. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 831–844. doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14246a
  10. Chaipidech, P., Srisawasdi, N., Kajornmanee, T., & Chaipah, K. (2022). A personalized learning system-supported professional training model for teachers’ TPACK development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3. doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100064
  11. Córcoles, C., Cobo, G., & Guerrero-Roldán, A. E. (2021). The usefulness of video learning analytics in small scale e-learning scenarios. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(21) 10366 doi.org/10.3390/app112110366
  12. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth Edi). Pearson Education, Inc.
  13. Ratnaningsih, D.J. & Hasanah, S.H. (2022). Development of website-based statistics learning videos. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(2), 271–282. doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i2.27153
  14. Dilling, F. & Vogler, A. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ reflections on attitudes towards teaching and learning mathematics with online Ppatforms at Sschool: A case Study in the context of a university online training. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. 28, 1401–1424 doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09602-0
  15. Dogan, S., Dogan, N.A., & Celik, I. (2021). Teachers’ skills to integrate technology in education: Two path models explaining instructional and application software use. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1311–1332. doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10310-4
  16. Dowansiba, N. & Hermanto, H. (2022). Strategi kepala sekolah menengah atas dalam menyiapkan sekolah penggerak. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 125–137. doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i2.3060
  17. Eiraldi, R., Comly, R., Goldstein, J., Khanna, M.S., McCurdy, B.L., Rutherford, L.E., Henson, K., Bevenour, P., Francisco, J., & Jawad, A.F. (2023). Development of an online training platform and implementation strategy for school-based mental health professionals in rural elementary schools: A mixed-methods study. School Mental Health. 15, 692–709 doi.org/10.1007/s12310-023-09582-1
  18. Ekantiningsih, P.D. & Sukirman, D. (2023). Trends of education and training teacher competency in information and communication technology. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1),87-105. doi.org/10.a/jitp.v10i1.52630
  19. Gideon, L. (2012). Handbook of Survey Methodology for Social Sciences. Springer International Publishing. doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3876-2
  20. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks. Sage Publications (2 ed.).
  21. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M.A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3 (February), 275–285. doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
  22. Hamid, O.H. & El Samad, A. (2015). The blurred line between “ long” and “short”: How the length of video lectures affects the viewing behavior of E-learners. Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems, 6(3), 32–38.
  23. Henschke, J.A. (2016). A History of andragogy and its documents as they pertain to adult basic and literacy education. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 25, 1–28.
  24. Herliana, A.A. & Wahyudin, D. (2018). Pemetaan kompetensi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) guru pada dimensi pedagogik. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(2), 134–148. doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v11i2.19825
  25. Hiryanto. (2017). Pedagogi, andragogi dan heutagogi serta implikasinya dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat. Dinamika Pendidikan, 22(01), 65–71.
  26. Katyeudo, K.K. & de Souza, R.A.C. (2022). Digital transformation towards education 4.0. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 283–309. doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2022.13
  27. Kemendikbudristek. (2021). Penetapan Satuan Pendidikan Pelaksana Program Sekolah Penggerak. Jakarta: Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah.
  28. Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Penetapan Satuan Pendidikan Pelaksana Program Sekolah Penggerak Angkatan II. Jakarta: Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah.
  29. Liana, M. & Alpindo, O. (2021). Pengembangan e-worksheets berorientasi ICT literacy pada mata kuliah Pengantar Teknologi Informasi Pendidikan Matematika untuk mahasiswa tahun pertama. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 223–237. doi.org/ 10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.453
  30. Listiaji, P. & Subhan, S. (2021). Pengaruh pembelajaran literasi digital pada kompetensi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi (TIK) calon guru. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(1), 107– 116. doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v6i1.1948
  31. Lu, Y., Hong, X., & Xiao, L. (2022). Toward high-quality adult online learning: A systematic review of empirical studies. Sustainability, 14(4). doi.org/10.3390/su14042257
  32. McCarthy, A.M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479. doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479
  33. Muhammaditya, N., & Hardjosoekarto, S. (2021). Divergensi transformasi digital pengelolaan bank soal menghadapi era masyarakat 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(1), 54-77. doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v6i1.1893
  34. Muslim, S., Puspa Arum, A., & Otto Fajarianto. (2022). Development of information and communication technology learning media. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(3), 381–388. doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i3.31522
  35. Purwati, D., Mardhiah, A., Nurhasanah, E., & Ramli, R. (2022). The six characteristics of andragogy and future research directions in EFL: A literature review. Elsya/ : Journal of English Language Studies, 4(1), 86–95. doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v4i1.7473
  36. Rahmawati, H. & Muhroji, M. (2022). Gaya belajar peserta didik usia dini berprestasi akademik.Jurnal Obsesi/ : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(6), 6384–6394. doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i6.3176
  37. Rajadell, M. & Garriga-Garzón, F. (2017). Educational videos: After the why, the how. Intangible capital, 13(5), 902–922. doi.org/10.3926/ic.1042
  38. Sleezer, C.M., Russ-Eft, D.F., & Gupta, K. (2014). A practical guide to needs assessment (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  39. Sugiyono, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kuantitatif dan R&D. Alfa Beta.
  40. Sunarti, V., Jamaris, Soelfema, Iswari, M., Hidayati, A., & Gusmanti, R. (2022). View of analysis of andragogy approach in aspects of tutor performance according to citizens learning equality education. Bisma The Journal Of Counseling, 6(2), 200–206. doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v6i2.51160
  41. Suparlan, H. (2015). Filsafat pendidikan Ki Hadjar Dewantara dan sumbangannya bagi pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat, 25(1), 56-74. doi.org/10.22146/jf.12614 Syuhada, S., Hanifah, A., Ghazali, N., Fauzi, A., Ayub, M., & Roslan, R. (2023). Predicting teachers ’ use of digital technology. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) 12(2), 555-562. doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.24237
  42. Tanti, T., Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Iqbal, M. (2021). Analysis of user responses to the application of web-based assessment on character assessment. Journal of Education Technology, 5(3), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.33590
  43. Ulandari, W. & Santaria, R. (2020). Strategi pengembangan profesionalitas guru melalui pendidikan dan pelatihan. Kelola: Journal of Islamic Education Management, 5(1), 57–68. doi.org/10.24256/kelola.v5i1.1412
  44. Wardana, D.K. & Adlini, M. N. (2022). Pengembangan video pembelajaran berbasis animasi materi sistem respirasi kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1301–1307. doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1641
  45. Windayanti, Afnanda M, Agustina R, Kase E.B.S., Safar M, & Mokodenseho S. (2023). Problematika guru dalam menerapkan Kurikulum Merdeka. Journal on Education, 06(01), 2056- 2063. doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3197
  46. Yamin, M. & Syahrir (2020). Pembangunan pendidikan Merdeka Belajar (telaah metode pembelajaran). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 6(1),126-136. doi.org/10.58258/jime.v6i1.1121