Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 9783 Download : 10048

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan implementasi kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka yang telah dikembangkan berdasar kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka, dan efeknya terhadap
keterampilan abad 21 mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menerapkan rancangan penelitian mixed method, yang melibatkan seluruh mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang. Data
kuantitatif dikumpulkan dari data pengisian angket sedangkan data kualitatif diperoleh dari hasil deep interview yang dilakukan selama pelaksanaan kegiatan pembelajaran di luar kampus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka telah mampu meningkatkan keterampilan komunikasi siswa, kreativitas siswa, berpikir kritis, dan peningkatan keterampilan kolaborasi siswa. Dari tiga bentuk kegiatan pembelajaran di luar kampus yang telah diterapkan, Kuliah Kerja Nyata Tematik merupakan bentuk kegiatan pembelajaran di luar kampus paling
efektif dalam meningkatkan keterampilan komunikasi dan kolaborasi. Bentuk kegiatan pembelajaran di luar kampus lainnya yaitu Asistensi Mengajar dan Kampus Mengajar efektif meningkatkan kreativitas dan berpikir kritis. Peningkatan keterampilan abad 21, dapat dilakukan dengan mengikutsertakan mahasiswa pada dua bentuk kegiatan pembelajaran di luar kampus dengan karakteristik lingkungan belajar berbeda.

Keywords

implementasi kurikulum MBKM kebijakan MBKM keterampilan abad 21

Article Details

How to Cite
Jufriadi, A., Huda, C., Aji, S. D., Pratiwi , H. Y., & Ayu, H. D. (2022). ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21 MELALUI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA BELAJAR KAMPUS MERDEKA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 39 - 53. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i1.2482

References

  1. Alaloul, W.S., Liew, M.S., Zawawi, N.A.W.A., & Kennedy, I.B. (2020). Industrial revolution 4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(1), 225–230. doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.010
  2. Anagün, .S. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions about the relationship between 21st century skills and managing constructivist learning environments. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 825–840. doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11452a
  3. Awang, H., & Daud, Z. (2015). Improving a communication skill through the learning approach towards the environment of engineering classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 480–486. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.241
  4. Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 87–98. doi.org/10.1108/13673270010372242
  5. Edmonds, W.A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). An Applied Guide to Research Designs (Second Ed.). USA: Sage Publication.
  6. Hake, R.R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
  7. Harden, R.M, Crosby, J.R., & Davis, M.H. (1999). AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 1 - An introduction to outcome-based education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7–14.
  8. Harden, R.M. (2007). Outcome-based education: The future is today. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 625–629. doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729930
  9. Janthon, U., Songkram, N., & Koraneekij, P. (2015). Work-based blended learning and technological scaffolding system to enhance communication skills for caregivers under local administrative organization, Ministry of Interior, Thailand (Part I). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 984–991. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.722
  10. Kamarudin, S.K., Abdullah, S.R.S., Kofli, N.T., Rahman, N.A., Tasirin, S.M., Jahim, J., & Rahman, R.A. (2012). Communication and teamwork skills in student learning process in the university. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 472–478. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.409
  11. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020a). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ujmte
  12. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020b). Buku Saku Panduan Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
  13. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2021). Buku Panduan Indikator Kinerja Utama Perguruan Tinggi (2nd ed.). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
  14. Lee, D., Huh, Y., & Reigeluth, C.M. (2015). Collaboration, intragroup conflict, and social skills in project-based learning. Instructional Science, 43(5), 561–590. doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9348-7
  15. Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Sumiati, I.D., Sari, T.M., & Ismirawati, N. (2019). RICOSRE: A learning model to develop critical thinking skills for students with different academic abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 417–434. doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12227a
  16. Pangestu, D.A., & Rochmat, S. (2021). Filosofi merdeka belajar berdasarkan perspektif pendiri bangsa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(1), 78–92. doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v6i1.1823
  17. Plucker, J.A., Beghetto, R.A., & Dow, G.T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
  18. Richardson, C., & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning environments that support student creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45–54. doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.004
  19. Ritter, R., Wehner, A., Lohaus, G., & Krämer, P. (2020). Effect of same-discipline compared to different-discipline collaboration on teacher trainees’ attitudes towards inclusive education and their collaboration skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87. doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102955
  20. Van Roey, A., Derom, I., De Bosscher, V., & De Martelaer, K. (2020). 21st century skills development and assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Poster session presented at 25th VBSW symposium
  21. Rymarczyk, J. (2020). Technologies, opportunities and challenges of the industrial revolution 4.0: Theoretical considerations. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(1) 185–198. doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080110
  22. Shahroom, A.A., & Hussin, N. (2018). Industrial Revolution 4.0 and education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 314–319. doi.org/ 10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i9/4593
  23. Shaw, A., Liu, O.L., Gu, L., Kardonova, E., Chirikov, I., Li, G., … Loyalka, P. (2020). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Validating the Russian HEIghten® critical thinking assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1933–1948. doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1672640
  24. Spuzic, S., Narayanan, R., Abhary, K., Adriansen, H. K., Pignata, S., Uzunovic, F., & Guang, X. (2016). The synergy of creativity and critical thinking in engineering design: The role of interdisciplinary augmentation and the fine arts. Technology in Society, 45, 1–7. doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.11.005
  25. Sternberg, R.J. (2000). Identifying and developing creative giftedness. Roeper Review, 23(2), 60–64. doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554067