Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 869 Download : 697

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh desentralisasi fiskal dan sistem manajemen pendidikan terhadap mutu sekolah dasar. Penelitian dilakukan melalui pendekatan kuantitatif dengan hipotesis. Populasi penelitian berjumlah 195 sekolah dasar neger di Kota Malang, Jawa Timuri. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara acak berstrata dan teknik pengambilan sampel probabilitas di mana total populasi dibagi menjadi kelompok berdasarkan kecamatan yang homogen. Jumlah sampel penelitian yang digunakan sejumlah 22 sekolah dasar negeri. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan desentralisasi fiskal berpengaruh tidak signifikan terhadap mutu sekolah tetapi terdapat pengaruh signifikans positif sistem manajemen pendidikan terhadap mutu sekolah dasar. Dengan demikian, desentraliasai fiskal dan manajemen pendidikan adalah faktor yang menentukan hasil pendidikan dan gabungan dampak keduanya bersifat sinergis dalam meningkatkan mutu sekolah.

Keywords

desentralisasi fiskal sistem manajemen pendidikan mutu sekolah dasar

Article Details

How to Cite
Triwiyanto, T., & Kusumaningrum, D. E. (2024). Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal dan Sistem Manajemen Pendidikan terhadap Mutu Sekolah Dasar di Kota Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(1), 35 - 46. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v9i1.4929

References

  1. Agyemang-Duah, W., Kafui Gbedoho, E., Peprah, P., Arthur, F., Kweku Sobeng, A., Okyere, J., & Mengba Dokbila, J. (2018). Reducing poverty through fiscal decentralization in Ghana and beyond: A review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1) doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1476035
  2. Anthony, B. (2023). Deployment of distributed ledger and decentralized technology for transition to smart industries. Environment Systems and Decisions, 43(2), 298–319. doi.org/10.1007/ s10669-023-09902
  3. Badenhorst, J.W., & Radile, R.S. (2018). Poor performance at TVET colleges: Conceptualising a distributed instructional leadership approach as a solution. Africa Education Review, 15(3), 91–112. doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1352452
  4. Bergin, T. (2018). An Introduction to Data Analysis: Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods. 1–296. SAGE Publications Ltd
  5. Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  6. Caldwell, B.J. (2018). The alignment premium: Benchmarking Australia’s student achievement, professional autonomy and system adaptivity. ACER Press.
  7. Caliba, I. (2022). Self-efficacy, working conditions, school-based management practices and performance of teachers. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(2), 107-125. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6523194
  8. Crook, R., & Manor, J. (2002). Democratic decentralization. In Making development work. Routledge.
  9. Dick-Sagoe, C. (2020). Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1-13. doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036
  10. Dona, E., Gautama, G., & Muslim, I. (2022). Berpengaruhkah desentralisasi fiskal dan kinerja pemerintah daerah terhadap akuntabilitas pelaporan keuangan? Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(12), 4153-4164. doi.org/10.47492/jip.v2i12.1519
  11. Efriandi, T., Couwenberg, O., & Holzhacker, R.L. (2019). Decentralization and public service provision: A case study of the education sector in Jayawijaya District, Papua, Indonesia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(3), 364–389. doi.org/10.1355/cs41-3b
  12. Ergenc, C., & Yuksekkaya, O. (2024). Institutionalizing authoritarian urbanism and the centralization of urban decision-making. Territory, Politics, Governance, 12(3), 410–429. doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2021.2020156
  13. Faguet, J.P. (2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53, 2–13. doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002George, A.S., Sagayarajan, S., AlMatroudi, Y., & George, A.S.H. (2023). IF/THEN Democracy: Exploring the World of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). Partners Universal International Research Journal, 2(2), Article 2. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8051072
  14. Gilrein, E.J., Carvalhaes, T.M., Markolf, S.A., Chester, M.V., Allenby, B.R., & Garcia, M. (2021). Concepts and practices for transforming infrastructure from rigid to adaptable. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 6(3–4), 213–234. doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2019.1599608
  15. Glover, D., & Levaèiæ, R. (2020). Educational resource management: An international perspective. UCL Press. doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787358386
  16. Groenewald, C.A., Groenewald, E., Uy, F., Kilag, O. K., Abendan, C.F., & Dulog, S.M. (2024). The future: Trends and implications for organizational management. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(3), 114-120. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/191
  17. Gundry, D., & Deterding, S. (2019). Validity threats in quantitative data collection with games: A narrative survey. Simulation & Gaming, 50(3), 302–328. doi.org/10.1177/1046878118805515
  18. Hanif, I., Wallace, S., & Gago-de-Santos, P. (2020). Economic growth by means of fiscal decentralization: An empirical study for federal developing countries. Sage Open, 10(4), 1-12 doi.org/10.1177/2158244020968088
  19. Jamieson, M.K., Govaart, G.H., & Pownall, M. (2023). Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner’s guide. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(4), e12735. doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12735
  20. Jennifer, A., Isravel, D.P., Sagayam, K.M., Bhushan, B., Sei, Y., & Eunice, J. (2023). Blockchain for healthcare systems: Architecture, security challenges, trends and future directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 215, 103633. doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2023.103633
  21. Jin, Y., & Rider, M. (2020). Does fiscal decentralization promote economic growth? An empirical approach to the study of China and India. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(6), 146–167. doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2019-0174
  22. Krawchenko, T. (2021). Public sector and productivity: Governing at the right scale Background paper for the OECD-EC High-Level Expert Workshop Series “Productivity Policy for Places”, April 18-19.
  23. Lee, J. (2024). Repowerment beyond empowerment: Collaborative accountability of citizens, corporations and civil servants. International Journal of Public Sector Management, ahead of-print(ahead-of-print). doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-11-2023-0340
  24. Li, A. (2022). Centralization or decentralization: Divergent paths of governing offshore wind between China and Japan. Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 102426. doi.org/10.1016/ j.erss.2021.102426
  25. Lubuulwa, K. B. (2021). Putting decentralisation policy into practice in Uganda: A participatory action research study of local government empowerment for local economic development. Thesis, University of Tasmania. doi.org/10.25959/23249999.v1
  26. Lunenburg, F. C. (2017). Organizational structure and design. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 1(1), 21–43.
  27. Luschei, T.F. (2012). The effectiveness and distribution of male primary teachers: Evidence from two Mexican states. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 145–154. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.12.001
  28. Madubun, J. (2023). Public services in island sub-districts: Towards geography-based governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, n/a(n/a), 1–21. doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12586
  29. Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095–1129. doi.org/10.1111/joes.12182
  30. Mesfin, S., & Teka, T. (2023). The practice of fiscal decentralization at local level in Ethiopia: Evidence from Oromia and Afar Regional States. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). doi.org/ 10.1080/23311886.2023.2241260
  31. Miranda-Lescano, R., Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2024). Redistributive efficiency of fiscal policy: The role of decentralization and good governance. Regional & Federal Studies, 34(2), 189–216. doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2022.2092844
  32. Mulisa, F. (2022). When does a researcher choose a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed research approach? Interchange, 53(1), 113–131. doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09447-z
  33. Muttaqin, T., van Duijn, M., Heyse, L., & Wittek, R. (2016). The impact of decentralization on educational attainment in Indonesia. R.L. Holzhacker, R. Wittek, & J. Woltjer (Eds.), Decentralization and Governance in Indonesia 2, 79–103). Springer International Publishing. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22434-3_4
  34. Nasrullah, Ul Amin, R., & Soomro, K.A. (2021, March 1). Decentralization of education: The affective role of fiscal decentralization in Pakistani Education System(s). FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 15, (1), 41-51. doi.org/10.51709/19951272/spring2021/15-4
  35. Nurlaili, M.Y.S.E. (2022). Analisis pengaruh desentralisasi fiskal terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di kabupaten/kota Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi JIE, 6(2), 178–187. doi.org/ 10.22219/jie.v6i2.20457
  36. Nyikadzino, T., & Vyas-Doorgapersad, S. (2022). Zimbabwe’s transition to a devolved system of government: Critical factors for success. Africa’s Public Service Delivery and Performance Review, 10(1), 604. doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v10i1.604
  37. Omapas, M.L., Parinasan, M.A., Ben, L., Peñero, R., & Quiñanola, K.J. (2024). The impact and challenges of school-based decision-making on educational outcomes. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(3), 39-44. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/173
  38. Patel, V., Chisholm, D., Dua, T., Laxminarayan, R., Medina-Mora, M.L., & Vos, T. (2016). Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 4): Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders. World Bank Publications.
  39. Pertiwi, V. (2023). Desentralisasi fiskal dan pola ketergantungan daerah Kota Batu Jawa Timur, JPAP: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 9(1), 47–58. doi.org/10.30996/jpap.v9i1.8268
  40. Prifti, R. (2022). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37(2), 111–125. doi.org/ 10.1080/02680513.2020.1755642
  41. Purwanto, E.A., & Pramusinto, A. (2018). Decentralization and functional assignment in Indonesia: The case of health and education services. Policy Studies, 39(6), 589–606. doi.org/10.1080/ 01442872.2018.1530413
  42. Putri, R.S.E., & Munandar, A. (2021). Analisis kinerja keuangan pemerintah daerah Kota Malang tahun anggaran 2016-2020. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 5(3), 2296-2313. doi.org/10.31955/mea.v5i3.1684
  43. Rosser, A.J., & Fahmi, M. (2016). The political economy of teacher management in decentralized Indonesia (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2885077). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2885077
  44. Sarwar, A., Jadoon, A.K., Javed, M.F., & Nasim, I. (2022). Assessing the effects of fiscal decentralization on the efficiency of education sector: Analysis of Punjab, Pakistan. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2). doi.org/10.52131/pjhss.2022.1002.0215
  45. Shah, A. (1998). Fostering fiscally responsive and accountable governance: Lessons from decentralization. In Evaluation and Development. Routledge.
  46. Shahid, M., Ahmad, K., Naushahi, M.M., & Inayat, M.A. (2024). Tax decentralization and economic growth of Pakistan: The role of political institutions. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(1), 78-88, doi.org/10.61506/01.00195
  47. Shaked, H. (2019). Ensuring teachers’ job suitability: A missing component of instructional leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 29(5), 427–447. doi.org/10.1177/1052684619858837
  48. Smidova, Z. (2019). Educational outcomes: A literature review of policy drivers from a macroeconomic perspective. OECD. doi.org/10.1787/990801aa-en
  49. Smith, B.C. (2023). Decentralization: The territorial dimension of the state. Taylor & Francis.
  50. Smoke, P. (2015). Rethinking decentralization: Assessing challenges to a popular public sector reform. Public Administration and Development, 35(2), 97–112. doi.org/10.1002/pad.1703
  51. Vaclavik, M., Sikorova, Z., & Barot, T. (2019). Particular analysis of normality of data in applied quantitative research. In R. Silhavy, P. Silhavy, & Z. Prokopova (Eds.), Computational and Statistical Methods in Intelligent Systems (pp. 353–365). Springer International Publishing. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00211-4_31
  52. Wang, W., Zheng, X., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Fiscal reform and public education spending: A quasi natural experiment of fiscal decentralization in China. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42(2), 334–356. doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjr039
  53. Wright, G.D., Andersson, K.P., Gibson, C.C., & Evans, T.P. (2016). Decentralization can help reduce deforestation when user groups engage with local government. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(52), 14958–14963. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610650114
  54. Zargham, M., & Nabben, K. (2022). Aligning ‘Decentralized Autonomous Organization’ to precedents in cybernetics (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4077358). doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4077358
  55. Zarkasyi, S., & Digdowiseiso, K. (2023). Analisis desentralisasi fiskal Kabupaten Bulukumba Tahun 2016-2020. Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal (MSEJ), 4(4), 4428-4434. doi.org/10.37385/msej.v4i5.2611