Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis asesmen pembelajaran bermakna dan efektif yang diterapkan di kelas. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan Narrative Literature Review dimana peneliti mengkaji 9 artikel yang sesuai dengan kriteria yang ditetapkan oleh peneliti. Artikel diambil dari beberapa database dengan kriteria yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan berlangsung dalam kurun waktu 10 tahun terakhir, dilakukan pada jenjang SD-SMA sederajat dan mengkaji asesmen pembelajaran bermakna yang meliputi asesmen alternatif maupun asesmen otentik. Hasil penelitian ini adalah asesmen pembelajaran bermakna harus dilakukan secara autentik yakni peserta didik mampu mendemonstrasikan apa yang ia pahami atas pembelajaran yang dilakukan sesuai dengan konteks kehidupannya dan akan efektif apabila lebih bersifat formatif yang memberikan berbagai informasi dalam bentuk umpan balik secara berkelanjutan bagi guru maupun peserta didik untuk saling merefleksikan guna mencapai tujuan pembelajaran yang diharapkan. Kesimpulannya adalah asesmen pembelajaran bermakna dan efektif berupa asesmen autentik yang dilakukan secara formatif mempunyai banyak manfaat bagi guru maupun peserta didik. Namun, terdapat beberapa tantangan yang perlu untuk diantisipasi oleh para guru agar proses penerapan di kelas bisa berjalan dengan optimal.
Keywords
Article Details
References
- Adhi, M.K. (2015). Asesmen otentik dalam pembelajaran sastra: suatu kajian pustaka. Aksara, 27(2), 217-227. doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/JPD.012.08
- Adnan, A., Suwandi, S., Nurkamto, J., & Setiawan, B. (2019). Teacher Competence in Authentic and Integrative Assessment in Indonesian Language Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 701–716. doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12145a
- Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
- Brookhart, S.M. (2019). Feedback and measurement. Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement. Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9780429507533-5
- Çalışkan, H., & Kaşıkçı, Y. (2010). The application of traditional and alternative assessment and evaluation tools by teachers in social studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4152–4156. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.656
- Dewi, A.P., Efendi, R., & Sasmita, D. (2021). Efektivitas integrasi asesmen formatif feedback dalam meningkatkan kemampuan kognitif peserta didik pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 1-5.
- English, N., Robertson, P., Gillis, S., & Graham, L. (2022). Rubrics and formative assessment in K-12 education: A scoping review of literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101964. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101964
- Ghaffar, M. A., Khairallah, M., & Salloum, S. (2020). Co-constructed rubrics and assessment for learning: The impact on middle school students’ attitudes and writing skills. Assessing Writing, 45, 100468. doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100468
- González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
- Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
- Ismail, S.M., Rahul, D.R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 40. doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
- Adhi, M.K. (2015). Asesmen otentik dalam pembelajaran sastra: suatu kajian pustaka. Aksara, 27(2), 217-227. doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/JPD.012.08
- Adnan, A., Suwandi, S., Nurkamto, J., & Setiawan, B. (2019). Teacher Competence in Authentic and Integrative Assessment in Indonesian Language Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 701–716. doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12145a
- Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
- Brookhart, S.M. (2019). Feedback and measurement. Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement. Routledge, doi: 10.4324/9780429507533-5
- Çalışkan, H., & Kaşıkçı, Y. (2010). The application of traditional and alternative assessment and evaluation tools by teachers in social studies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4152–4156. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.656
- Dewi, A.P., Efendi, R., & Sasmita, D. (2021). Efektivitas integrasi asesmen formatif feedback dalam meningkatkan kemampuan kognitif peserta didik pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 1-5.
- English, N., Robertson, P., Gillis, S., & Graham, L. (2022). Rubrics and formative assessment in K-12 education: A scoping review of literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 113, 101964. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101964
- Ghaffar, M. A., Khairallah, M., & Salloum, S. (2020). Co-constructed rubrics and assessment for learning: The impact on middle school students’ attitudes and writing skills. Assessing Writing, 45, 100468. doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100468
- González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493. doi.org/10.3390/su14031493
- Havnes, A., Smith, K., Dysthe, O., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(1), 21–27. doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
- Ismail, S.M., Rahul, D.R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 40. doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00191-4
- Kurniawan, G.B. (2012). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan asesmen otentik terhadap prestasi belajar matematika ditinjau dari keterampilan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesia, 1(1), 1-18.
- doi.org/10.23887/jppm.v1i1.415
- Marhaeni, A.A.I.N. (2015). Asesmen autentik dan pendidikan bermakna: Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. JPI: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1), 499-511, doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v4i1.4889
- Mohamed, R., & Lebar, O. (2017). Authentic Assessment in Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 466-476. doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2021
- Monteiro, V., Mata, L., & Santos, N.N. (2021). Assessment Conceptions and Practices: Perspectives of Primary School Teachers and Students. Frontiers in Education, 6, 631185. doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631185
- Mustikarani, W., & Ruhimat, M. (2018). Kelemahan dan keungulan implementasi authentic assessment dalam pembelajaran Geografi. Jurnal Geografi Gea, 18(2), 147–153.
- Poerwanti, J.I.S. (2012). Pengembangan model asesmen autentik mata pelajaran bahasa Indonesia di sekolah dasar. Sekolah Dasar: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan, 21(2), 152–158.
- Ramatni, A., Anjely, F., Cahyono, D., Rambe, S., & Shobri, M. (2023). Proses Pembelajaran dan Asesmen yang Efektif. Journal on Education, 05(04), 15729–15743. doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2687
- Rosidah, C.T., Pramulia, P., & Susiloningsih, W. (2021). Analisis kesiapan guru mengimplementasikan asesmen autentik dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(01), 87–103. doi.org/10.21009/JPD.012.08
- Rosnaeni, R. (2021). Karakteristik dan Asesmen Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 4341–4350. doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1548
- Schellekens, L.H., Bok, H.G.J., de Jong, L.H., van der Schaaf, M.F., Kremer, W.D.J., & van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (2021). A scoping review on the notions of Assessment as Learning (AaL), Assessment for Learning (AfL), and Assessment of Learning (AoL). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 101094. doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101094
- Sofwan, A., & Aliningsih, F. (2015). English teachers’ perceptions and practices of authentic assessment. Journal of Language and Literature, 10(01), 19–27.
- Sugiri, W.A., & Priatmoko, S. (2020). Persprektif asesmen autentik sebagai alat evaluasi dalam merdeka belajar. At-Thullab : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 53-61. doi.org/10.30736/atl.v4i1.119
- Suhartawan, G.E., Santyasa, W., & Kirna, M. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif group investigation dengan asesmen otentik terhadap prestasi belajar dan konsep diri siswa. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia, 8(2), 32-50. doi.org/10.23887/jtpi.v8i2.2275
- Takele, M., & Melese, W. (2022). Primary school teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment and their Relationships. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-16. doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2090185