Yasser Awaluddin


It has been claimed that the implementation of Guru Pembelajar Program has successfully improved the participation of competent teachers. Yet, there has not been any thorough and detailed studies regarding the effectiveness of the program on each subject including social studies. This research aims to reveal whether the Guru Pembelajar Program using mode of fully online and blended learning has improved social studies teachers’ competency. This research also compares the effectiveness of the two modes, and reveals participants’ perception on the program. Mix method which analysed both quantitative and qualitative data was used in this study. Descriptive analysis and gap analysis were used for the quantitative part, while the qualitative aspect was carried out using pattern and theme analysis of participants’ responses. Findings show that both modes effectively improved teachers’ competency. There was a significant different in learning result from the two modes. However, the difference was due to the initial gap between the participants of the two modes. Participating teachers conveyed that the training was relevant with their teaching tasks and was effective in increasing their skill. In conclusion, the Teacher Learning Program implementation is effective in improving teacher competence, either by pure online mode or blended mode.


Pelaksanaan Program Guru Pembelajar telah berhasil meningkatkan kompetensi guru yang mengikuti program tersebut. Namun, sejauh ini belum ada kajian secara mendalam dan rinci mengenai sejauh mana tingkat efektivitas program tersebut pada masing-masing mata pelajaran termasuk mata pelajaran IPS SMP. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap apakah program guru pembelajar yang dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan moda daring murni dan daring kombinasi berhasil meningkatkan kompetensi guru IPS SMP. Penelitian ini juga membandingkan efektivitas kedua moda yang digunakan. Selain itu, persepsi dan pendapat peserta mengenai pelatihan dengan moda daring murni dan daring kombinasi juga akan diungkap. Pendekatan campuran untuk menganalisis data baik secara kuantitatif maupun kualitatif digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Analisis deskriptif dan analisis uji beda digunakan untuk aspek kuantitatif, sedangkan aspek kualitatif dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan analisis tema dan pola respon peserta. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa baik pelatihan moda daring murni maupun daring kombinasi berhasil meningkatkan kompetensi peserta. Terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara moda daring murni dan daring kombinas yang disebabkan oleh input awal yang berbeda. Peserta menyatakan bahwa pelatihan ini relevan dengan tugas-tugas mengajar mereka dan efektif meningkatkan kompetensi mereka. Dengan demikian, Pelaksanaan Program Guru Pembelajar efektif dalam meningkatkan kompetensi guru, baik dilakukan dengan moda daring murni maupun moda daring kombinasi.


fully online learning, blended learning, teacher competence, daring murni, daring kombinasi, kompetensi guru, Guru Pembelajar

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)


Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250.

Collopy, R. M., & Arnold, J. M. (2009). To blend or not to blend: online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2).

Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324-340.

Evans, D., Tate, S., Navarro, R., & Nicolls, M. (2009). Teacher education and professional development in Indonesia a gap analysis. USAID.

Gaspariè, R. P., & Peèar, M. (2016). Analysis of an asynchronous online discussion as a supportive model for peer collaboration and reflection in teacher education. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 369-393.

Holmes, B. (2013). School teachers’ continuous professional development in an online learning community: lessons from a case study of an eTwinning learning event. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 197.

Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G. & Higgins, A. (2014). Blended learning: how teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 121-140.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Pedoman Umum Guru Pembelajar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2007).

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional nomor 16 tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru.

Kuo, Y.-C., & Belland, B. R. (2016). An exploratory study of adult learners’ perceptions of online learning: minority students in continuing education. Education Technology Research Development. 64(4), 661-680.

Larson, D. K., & Sung, C.-H. (2009). Comparing student performance: online versus blended versus face-to-face. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 31-42.

Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.

Senn, G. J. (2008). Comparison of face-to-face and hybrid delivery of a course that requires technology skills development. Journal of Information Technology Education, 7, 267-283.

Taft, S. H., Perkowski, T., & Martin, L. S. (2011). A framework for evaluating class size in online education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(3), 181-197.

York, R. O. March. (2008). Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), 157-172.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24832%2Fjpnk.v3i1.717


  • There are currently no refbacks.

View My Stats

Copyright of Balitbang Kemendikbud © 2016

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.