Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 825 Download : 1688

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The curriculum is a product of the time, it has always been a representation of passion of time. The existence of curriculum evaluation plays a strategic role to find out the practical relevance of the curriculum and spirit of the times. The curriculum evaluation can determine not only whether the curriculum can contribute to prepare students to survive but also whether the curriculum is able to equip learners to live a noble life. Actually, the evaluation of the curriculum has not received sufficient attention from both academics and practitioners of education in developing countries, including in Indonesia. Efforts to understand and spread awareness about the significance of curriculum evaluation in reformulation of education policy are prerequisites in the improvement of education. This paper aims to conduct a literature review to give a spotlight on the dynamics of curriculum evaluation praxis.


ABSTRAK

 

Setiap kurikulum merupakan produk zaman, sehingga keberadaannya senantiasa merepresentasikan semangat zaman ketika kurikulum tersebut dikembangkan. Untuk mengetahui relevansi teori dan praktik (praksis) kurikulum dengan tuntutan semangat zaman diperlukan adanya evaluasi kurikulum. Melalui evaluasi kurikulum dapat diketahui apakah kurikulum mampu berkontribusi mempersiapkan peserta didik bertahan hidup dan pada saat bersamaan mampu membekali peserta didik untuk menjalani dan memuliakan kehidupan (nobelling life). Dalam realitas aktualnya, evaluasi kurikulum belum mendapat perhatian proporsional di kalangan akademisi maupun praktisi pendidikan di negara-negara berkembang, termasuk di Indonesia. Untuk itu, upaya memahami dan menyebar-luaskan kesadaran mengenai signifikansi evaluasi kurikulum dalam reformulasi kebijakan pendidikan merupakan prasyarat dalam pembenahan pendidikan pada masa-masa mendatang. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk melakukan studi literatur mengenai dinamika dan kompleksitas teori dan praktik evaluasi kurikulum yang diharapkan dapat memberi secercah terang mengenai salah satu ranah kajian dalam displin ilmu kurikulum.

Article Details

How to Cite
Musanna, A. (2012). Quo Vadis Praksis Evaluasi Kurikulum: Studi Pendahuluan terhadap Ranah Kurikulum yang Terlupakan*). Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 18(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v18i1.64

References

  1. Arroyo, G. 2004. Tylers Rational and the Reconceptualist: Interview With Ralph W. Tyler (1902-1994) dalam Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educative, 6(2). 1-22
  2. Beauchamp, G. A. 1975. Curriculum Theory. Illionis: The Kagg Press
  3. Beeby, C. E. 1987. Pendidikan di Indonesia: Penilaian dan Pedoman Perencanaan, terj. BP3K dan YIIS, cet. III. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  4. Butler, D.J. 1968. Four Philosophies and Their Practice in Education and Religion. Third Edition. Manila:Friends Offset.
  5. Caracelli, V. J. 2006. Enhancing the Policy Process Through the Use of Ethnography and Other Study Framework: A Mixed Methods dalam Research in The Schools, 13 (1), 84-92
  6. Cronbach, L.J. Ed., 1980. Toward Reform of Program Evaluation: Aims, Methods, and Institutional Arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  7. Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S., Ed. 2009. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Terj. Dariyatno. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  8. Ellis, A. K., Mackey, J. A., dan Gleen, A.D. 1987. The School Curriculum. Needham Height: Allyn and Bacon.
  9. Frechtling, J. 2007. User Friendly Handbook for Mixed Methods Evaluation. New Jersey: National Science Foundations.
  10. Greene, J. C. 2008. Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? dalam Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2 (1),. 7-22.
  11. Greene, J.C. 2005. The Generative Potential of Mixed Methods Inquiry dalam International Journal of Research dan Method in Education, 28 (2), 207-211.
  12. Greene, J.C., McCintock, Charless. 1991. The Evolution of Evaluation Methodology dalam Theory Into Practice, XXX (1), 13-21.
  13. Guba, E., Lincoln, Y. S.1989. Fourth Evaluation Generation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
  14. Guba, E., Lincoln, Y.S. 1981. Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
  15. Gyroux, H.A., Penna, A. N., Pinar, W.F., Ed. 1981. Curriculum and Instruction: Alternatives in Education. Berkeley: McChutchan.
  16. Hasan, S. H. 2008. Evaluasi Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  17. Jasparro, R.J. 1998. Applying Systems Thinking to Curriculum Evaluation dalam NASSP Bulletin, 82 (598), 80-86.
  18. Johnson, R. Burke., O, Anthony J. and Turner, L.A. 2007. Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods dalam Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1 (2), 112-133.
  19. Kelly, A.V. 2006. The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. 5th Edition. London: SAGE Publisher.
  20. Kneller, G.F. Ed. 1971. Foundations of Education. Third Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  21. Lewy, A., Ed. 1977. Handbook of Curriculum Evaluation. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning/Unesco.
  22. Mapajanti, A.A. 2005. Kemandirian Lokal: Konsepsi Pembangunan, Organisasi dan Pendidikan dari Perspektif Sains Baru. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  23. Marsh, C.J. dan Willis, G. 2007. Curriculum: Alternative Approach, Ongoing Issues. New York: McMillan Publishing.
  24. McCormick, R.M., James, M. 1983. Curriculum Evaluation in Schools. London: Croom Helm.
  25. McDavid, J.C., Hawtthorn, L.R. 2006. Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement: an Introduction to Practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  26. Meyers, L.H. 2005. Time for Tun-Up: Comprehensive Curriculum Evaluation dalam Principal Leadership, 6 (1), 27-30.
  27. Oliva, P.F. 1993. Curriculum Development. Third Edition. New York: HarperCollins.
  28. Ornstein, A. C. Hunkins, F.P. 2009. Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues. Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson International.
  29. Palfrey, C., Thomas, P. 1999. Politics and Policy Evaluation dalam Public Policy and Administration. 14 (4),58-70.
  30. Patton, Michael Quin. 2002. Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiental Perspective dalam Qualitative Social Work, 1 (3), 261-282.
  31. Patton, Michael Quinn. 2006. How to Use Qualitative Method in Evaluation. Terj. Budi Puspo Priyadi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  32. Popham, James W. 2006. Transformatif Asseesment. New York: ASCD
  33. Posner, G.F. 1992. Analyzing the Curriculum. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  34. Rosa, C., Nyre, G.F. 1977. The Practice of Evaluation. Los Angeles: ERIC Clearing House on Test,Measurement and Evaluation.
  35. Royse, D., Thyer, B.A., Padgett, D.K., Logan, TK., 2009. Program Evaluation: an Introduction. 4th Edition. Australia: Thompson.
  36. Saylor, J. Galen., Alexander, W.M., Lewis, A.J. 1981. Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning.Fourth Edition. Tokyo: Holt-Saunders.
  37. Schriven, M.2001. Evaluation: Future Tense dalam American Journal of Evaluation, 22 (3), 301-307.
  38. Smith, J.K., Heshusius, L. 1986. Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-QualitativeDebate Among Educational Inquiry dalam Educational Researcher, 15 (4), 4-14.
  39. Al Musanna, Quo Vadis Praksis Evaluasi Kurikulum: Studi Pendahuluan terhadap Ranah Kurikulum yang Terlupakan
  40. Smith, N.L., Brandon, P.R. 2008. Fundamental Issues in Evaluation. New York: The Guilford Press.
  41. Stake, R. E. 1975. Program Evaluation: Particularly Responsive Evaluation. Illionis: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation (CIRCE) University of Illionis.
  42. Stake, R.E. 2004. Standard Based Evaluation and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
  43. Stufflebeam, D.F., Madaus, G.F. 2000. Program Evaluation: A Historical Overview dalam Stufflebeam, D.F.,
  44. Madaus, G.F., Kellaghan, T. Ed. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Second Edition. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  45. Sudjiono, A. 2008. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  46. Sukmadinata, N.S. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  47. Surakhmad, W. 2009. Pendidikan Nasional: Strategi dan Tragedi. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.
  48. Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A. 2009. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  49. Tilaar, H.A.R. 2002. Perubahan Sosial dan Pendidikan: Pengantar Pedagogik Transformatif untuk Indonesia. Jakarta: Grasindo.
  50. Tyler, R.W. 1981. Specific Approaches to Curriculum Development dalam Gyroux, H.A., Penna, A.N., Pinar, W.F., Ed. Curriculum and Instruction: Alternatives in Education. Berkeley: McChutchan Publishing. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
  51. Zamroni. 2000. Pendidikan Masa Depan. Malang: Bigraf Publishing.