Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 639 Download : 3427

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to know the impact of eclectic teaching model, measure the extent of eclectic teaching model on the learning achievement, and measure the role of cognition in facilitating the learning achievement of Bahasa Indonesia. This research was conducted to a group of students in 75 inclusive elementary schools in Boyolali assigned in cluster random sampling. Quasi experiment was applied for 68 sixth graders representing both experiment and control groups. The data was analyzed by means of ANCOVA as to compare the learning achievement before and after treatment, between both experiment and control groups as controlled by cognition. The research come to conclusion that: eclectic teaching model gave significant impact of the student learning achievement, eclecti teaching model was more effective than conventional teaching method, the cognition turned to take role to the improvement of the student learning achievement.

 

ABSTRAK

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui ada tidaknya dampak model pembelajaran Eklektik terhadap prestasi belajar, mengetahui seberapa besar dampak model pembelajaran Eklektik terhadap prestasi belajar, dan mengetahui peran kognisi dalam mempengaruhi perubahan hasil belajar siswa. Penelitian dilaksanakan terhadap sampel yang diambil secara acak melalui cluster random sampling dari sejumlah 75 Sekolah Dasar penyelenggara pendidikan inklusi di Kabupaten Boyolali. Metode penelitian ini adalah experimen tidak penuh (quasi experiment) dengan menggunakan 68 siswa kelas VI SD yang dibagi menjadi kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok kontrol. Data peneltian dianalisis melalui ANAKOVA dengan cara membandingkan hasil belajar sebelum dan setelah perlakuan dan membandingkan hasil belajar kelompok eksperimen dan kelompok ontrol dengan mempertimbangkan pengaruh kognisi. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa: model pembelajaran eklektik memberikan pengaruh signifikan pada prestasi belajar siswa, model pembelajaran eklektik lebih effektif dibanding dengan metode tradisional, peningkatan hasil belajar siswa juga dipengaruhi oleh kemampuan kognisi siswa.

Article Details

How to Cite
--, G. (2010). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Eklektik dalam Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Bahasa Indonesia dengan Kovarian Kognisi di Sekolah Inklusif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 16(7), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v16i7.506

References

  1. Ainscow, M. 2000. The next step for special education: Supporting the development of inclusive practices; British Journal of Special Education, 27, (2), 45-69.
  2. Bambang Saptono. 2006. Mereformasi sekolah melalui manajemen berbasis sekolah. Didaktika, 1, (1), 47-55.
  3. Bloom. B. S. 1982. Human interactions and school learning. New York : Mc Grow – Hill.
  4. Bruning, R. 2004. Constructive psychology and instruction. New Jersey: Pierson Education, Inc.
  5. Buchori, M. 2007. Evolusi pendidikan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.
  6. Burden, P. R. & Byrd, D.M. 2003. Methods for effective teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  7. Burstein, N; Sears, S; Wicoxson, A; Cabello, B; & Spagna, A. 2004. Moving toward inclusive practices.
  8. Remedial and Special Education, 25, (2), 104-116
  9. DeVries, R., Zan, B., Edmiaston, R., Sales, C. 2002. Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical principle and activities. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
  10. Driscoll, M. P. 2005. Psychology of learning for instruction. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  11. Galotti, K. 2004. Cognitive psychology. California: Wadsworths/Thomson Learning.
  12. Hallahan, D., & Kauffman, J. 2003. Exceptional children: Introduction to special education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc.
  13. Harwell, J. 2001. Complete learning disabilities handbook: New second edition. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Son. Inc.
  14. Januszewski, A. & Molenda, M. 2008. Educational technology: A definition and commentary. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
  15. LaRocque, M. & Darling, S. 2008. Blended curriculum in the inclusive K3 classroom: Teaching all young children. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  16. Parkin, A. 2000. Essential cognitive psychology. Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.
  17. Pritchard, A. 2005. Ways of learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom. London: David Fulton Publishers. Ltd.
  18. Rukayah, Yenny, & Gunarhadi. 2008. Korelasi kemampuan penalaran dan minat baca dengan hasil belajar keterampilan bahasa dan sastra Indonesia mahasiswa PGSD FKIP UNS; Fenolingua, Jurnal Bahasa dan Pengajarannya, 15, (2), 403-421.
  19. Salvia, J. & Yeseldyke, J. E. 1995. Assessment. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Company.
  20. Sekaran, U. 2003. Research methods for business : A skill building approach, New York : John Willey & Son.
  21. Smith, D. 2004. Introduction to special education : Teaching in an age of opportunity. Boston : Person Education, Inc.
  22. Sutrisno Hadi. 2004. Metodologi Riset, Yogyakarta: Andi.
  23. Solso, R. & Mc. Lin, K. 2002. Experimental psychology: A case approach. Boston: A Pearson Education Company.
  24. Watkins, C. 2003. Learning: A sense-maker’s guide. London: Association of Teachers and Lecturers.
  25. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. 2001. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspective. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers