PERSEPSI SISWA TERHADAP DAYA JUANG MEREKA SERTA POLA ASUH ORANGTUA DAN GURU DI SD BERAKREDITASI A DAN C DI KABUPATEN BANTUL DAN BONE BOLANGO*)

Nur Listiawati

Abstract


This study aims to examine students’ perception of their parents and teacher in instilling and developing students potential to improve their adversity quotient and students’ perception on their adversity quotient. This study is a case study carried out in two A and C accredited primary schools each in Bantul District and Bone Bolango District. Measurement of parenting used the inventory method. Measurement of students’ adversity quotient was conducted by the self-inventory method. Study result shows that accredited A primary school students’ perception on the parenting of parents and teachers and their adversity quotient in general are better than students’ perception of accredited C primary school. Parents cognitive abilities affect their ability to guide their children in analyzing and limit problems. The ability of teachers in the aspect of listening is lower than other aspects, namely, guiding to explore, analyze, and do something. Parenting from parents and teachers contribute to develope students adversity quotient significantly. However, it is only for few aspects such as guiding to explore, analyze, and do something that influenced. Even in sample schools located in Bantul, partially there is no aspect of teachers parenting that contributed to students adversity quotient. Perceptions of students in Bantul on their adversity quotient is generally higher than students in Bone Bolango.The study concludes that parents cognitive ability affect their ability to guide their child to analyze and isolate the problem. Growing and developing students’ adversity quotient will be more meaningful if collaboration between teacher and parents is improved.

 

ABSTRAK

Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pola asuh orang tua dan guru dalam menumbuhkan potensi daya juang siswa dan persepsi siswa terhadap potensi daya juang mereka. Studi ini merupakan studi kasus yang dilakukan di dua sekolah berakreditasi A dan C masing-masing di Kabupaten Bantul dan Kabupaten Bone Bolango. Pengukuran pola asuh orangtua dan guru menggunakan metode inventory. Pengukuran persepsi siswa terhadap potensi daya juang mereka dilakukan dengan metode self inventory. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa secara umum persepsi siswa terhadap pola asuh orangtua dan guru serta daya juang siswa di sekolah berakreditasi A lebih baik daripada persepsi siswa di sekolah sampel berakreditasi C. Kemampuan kognitif orangtua memengaruhi kemampuan membimbing anak untuk menganalisis dan membatasi masalah. Kemampuan guru dalam aspek mendengarkan lebih rendah daripada aspek lainnya yakni membimbing untuk mengeksplorasi, menganalisis dan membatasi masalah, serta bertindak. Pola asuh orangtua dan guru memberikan kontribusi pada penumbuhkembangan potensi daya juang siswa. Namun, secara parsial hanya aspek membimbing untuk mengeksplorasi,menganalisa masalah, dan bertindak yang memengaruhi. Bahkan, pada SD sampel yang berada di Kabupaten Bantul secara parsial tidak ada aspek pola asuh guru yang berkontribusi secara signifikan pada penumbuhkembangan potensi daya juang siswa. Persepsi siswa di Kabupaten Bantul terhadap potensi daya juangnya secara umum lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa di Kabupaten Bone Bolango. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa kemampuan kognitif orangtua memengaruhi kemampuan membimbing anak untuk menganalisis dan membatasi masalah. Penumbuhkembangan daya juang siswa lebih bermakna jika kolaborasi antara guru dan orangtua lebih ditingkatkan.


Keywords


students’ adversity quotient, parenting, teacher’s parenting, students’ perception, daya juang siswa, pola asuh orangtua, pola asuh guru, persepsi siswa.

Full Text:

PDF (Indonesian)

References


Adams, G. & Dubay, L. 2014. Exploring Instability and Children Well-Being: Insights from a Dialogue among Practitioners, Policy Makers and Researchers. United States: Urban Institute.

Astutik, E.W., Wismanto, Y. B., Goeritno, H. 2012. Studi tentang Regulasi Diri dalam Belajar, Efikasi Diri dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Prediksi, Kajian Ilmiah Psikologi, II(1), 203-206.

Aswar, S. 2000. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Chamidah, A.N. 2009. Deteksi Dini Gangguan Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Anak. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 5(2), 83-93.

Cherry, K. 2016. What is a Self Report Inventory?, https://www.verywell.com/what-is-a-self-report-inventory-2795587, diakses 11 September 2016.

Desstya, A. 2014. Kedudukan dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Sains di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Profesi Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 193-200, journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/ppd/article/download/1002/679, diakses 18 Oktober 2016.

Dodorico, J.D. 2008. Measuring Personality Constructs: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Self Reports. Informant Reports and Behavioural Assessments, Enquire, 1(1), 75-94.

https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/shared/ shared_enquire/PDFs/Dodorico_J.pdf. diakses 11 September 2016.

Eccles, J.S. 1999. The Development of Children Ages 6 to 14. Journal The Future of Children WHEN SCHOOL IS OUT, 9(2), https://www.princeton.edu/futureofchildren/publications/docs/09_02_02.pdf. diakses 17 Oktober 2016.

Eccles, J.S. & Kean, Pamela E. Davis. 2005. Influences of Parents’ Education on Their Children’s Educational Attainments: The role of Parent and Child Perceptions. London Review of Education, 3(3), 191-204, http://rcgd.isr.umich.edu/garp/articles/eccles05i.pdf., diakses tanggal 9 September 2016.

George, D & Malery, P. 2003. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference II.D Update (4th ed.). Boston: Allys & Bacon.

Hafstad, G.S., Haavind, H., & Jensen, T.K. 2011. Parenting After a Natural Disater: a Qualitative Study of Norwegian Families Surviving the 2004 Tsunami in Southeast Asia. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(2), 293-302, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3304071/, diakses 9 September 2016.

Hasanah, H. 2010. Hubungan antara Adversity Quotient dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMUN 102 Jakarta Timur. Skripsi. Jakarta: Program Sarjana Fakultas Psikologi. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Hervira, A. & Maharani, Y. 2012. Pusat Tumbuh Kembang Anak. Jurnal Tingkat Sarjana Bidang Seni Rupa dan Desain, 1(1), 1-10. s1.fsrd.itb.ac.id/index.php/interior/article/download/42/40, diakses 18 Oktober 2016.

Hidayati, I.A. 2016. Daya Juang Pelajar Berprestasi dengan Keterbatasan Kondisi. Tesis. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, eprints.ums.ac.id/43496/22/Naskahsip.pdf, diakses 9 September 2016.

Ibda, F. 2015. Perkembangan Kognitif: Teori Jean Piaget. Jurnal Intelektualita, 3, (1),27-38.

Karini, S. M., Herlinawati, S. W., & Moelyo, A. G. 2009. Gambaran Kasus Psikologi Anak di Klinik Tumbuh Kembang Anak RSUD DR. Moewardi Surakarta. Jurnal Wacana Psikologi, 1(1), 1-9. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2015. Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2015-2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Lestari, E. 2014. Hubungan Orientasi Masa Depan dengan Daya Juang pada Siswa-Siswi Kelas XII Di SMA Negeri 12 Samarinda Utara. e-Journal Psikologi, 2(3), 314-326.

Mausethagen, S. 2013. A Research Review of the Impact of Accountability Policies on Teachers’ Workplace Relations. Elsevier Journal Educational Research Review, 9, 16-33.

Musfirah. 2013. Perkembangan Sosial Anak Usia 11-12 Tahun di Homeschooling Primagama Yogyakarta. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

Mutammam, M. B. & Budiarto, M. T. 2013. Pemetaan Perkembangan Kognitif Piaget Siswa SMA Menggunakan Tes Operasi Logis (TOL) Piaget Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin.

MATHEdunesa, 2(2), 1-6, unesa.ac.id/article/4717/30/article.pdf. diakses 18 Oktober 2016.

Noviarni, S. 2015. Menumbuhkan Daya Juang Anak. http://www.koran-sindo.com/news.php?r=3&n=8&date=2015-12-30 Edisi 30 Desember 2015, diakses 8 September 2016.

Oktariningtyas, A. M. 2010. Daya Juang: Motivasi Berprestasi. Tesis. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Atmajaya.

Patenaude, M. 2015. Stress in Low-income Families can Effect Children’s Learning. University of Rochester, http://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/stress-in-low-income-families-canaffect-childrens-learning-108182/, diakses 9 September 2016.

Prastowo, A. 2014. Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Psikologis Peserta Didik SD/MI melalui Pembelajaran Tematik-Terpadu. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar (JPSD), 1(1), 1-13. journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/JPSD/article/download/538/351, diakses 18 Oktober 2016.

Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2015. Kajian Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan pada Pendidikan Dasar: Perilaku Menyimpang Pelajar (Laporan Tahun 2015). Jakarta: Puslitjakdikbud.

Raeff, C. 2006. Always Separate, Always Connected: Independence and Interdependence in Cultural Contexts of Development. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Rafiq, H. M. W., Fatima, T.S., Malik, M., Saleem, M. & Khan, M. A. 2013. Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement: A Study on Secondary School Students of Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3, (8) 209-223. Sumber: http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_8_Special_Issue_April_2013/22.pdf, diakses 19 Oktober 2016.

Robin, V. 2016. Kokoh dan Tangguh Inilah Wanita Gorontalo, http://hargo.co.id/berita/koko-dantanggu-inilah-wanita-gorontalo.html., diakses 19 Oktober 2016.

Ryan, R. M.,& Deci, E. 2006. Self-Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-Determination, and Will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/SDT/documents/2006_RyanDeci_Self-RegulationProblemofHumanAutonomy.pdf, diakses 19 Oktober 2016.

Sandstrom, H. & Huerta, S. 2013. The Negative Effects of Instability on Child Development: A Research Synthesis. United States: Urban Intitute Report: Low Income Working Families Fact Sheet, September 2013. http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/412908-The-Negative-Effects-of-Instability-on-Child-Development-Fact-Sheet.PDF, diakses 16 September 2016.

Santos, M. C. J. 2012. Assessing the Effectiveness of the Adapted Adversity Quotient Program in a Special Education School. International Refereed Research Journal, 4(2) www.researchersworld.com/vol3/.../Paper_02.pdf. diakses 19 Oktober 2016.

Setiawan, P. 2015. Perilaku Sosial Siswa Peserta Ekstrakurikuler Karate di Sekolah Dasar Kristen. Bina Harapan Purbalingga. Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sokol, J. T. 2009. Identity Development Throughout the Lifetime: An Examination of Eriksonian Theory. Graduate Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1, (2) 1-11. http://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent. cgi?article=1030&context=gjcp, diakses 19 Oktober 2016.

Stoltz, P. G. 1997. Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles Into Opportunities. New York: Wiley.

Susanti, N. 2013. Hubungan antara Dukungan Sosial dan Daya Juang dengan Orientasi Wirausaha pada Mahasiswa Program Profesi Apoteker Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Empathy, 2(1), 1-15. http://www.jogjapress.com/index.php/EMPATHY/article/viewFile/1548/886, diakses 7 September 2016.

Syamsussabri, M. 2013. Konsep Dasar Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Jurnal Perkembangan Peserta Didik, 1(1), 1-8.

Tatala, M. 2009. The Role of Personal Adjustment to Developmental Crises in Improving Quality of Life. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 1(10), 187-193, http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article 1380358744_Tatala.pdf, diakses 19 Oktober 2016.

Wati, M. 2016. Hubungan antara Perhatian Orangtua dan Sikap Siswa terhadap Layanan Pembelajaran dengan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Lendeh Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Skripsi. Program Studi Bimbingan dan Konseling Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta.

Webley, P. & Nyhus, E. K. 2006. Parents’ Influence on Children’s Future Orientation and Saving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 140-164. http://home.uia.no/ellenkn/WebleyNyhus2006.pdf., diakses 19 Oktober 2016.

Willingham, D. T. 2012. Ask the Cognitive Scientist: Why Does Family Wealth Affect Learning?Journal of American Educator, Spring 2012, 33-39. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Willingham.pdf., diakses 19 Oktober 2016.

Winarsih, R. 2006. Kurikulum Kesenian Pasca Gempa SD/MI di daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Imaji, 4(2) 157-165., http://eprints.uny.ac.id/4988/1/KURIKULUM_KESENIAN _PASCA_GEMPA_SD.pdf., diakses 9 September 2016.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright of Balitbang Kemendikbud © 2016

        Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.