Main Article Content

Abstract

The ground reasons of this study is in what way transformational leadership is suitable to increase education quality in vocational high school. Meanwhile, the specific problems are as follows: (1) do principals’ competency variables consisting of personality, management, entrepreneurship, supervision, and social competency dimensions directly contribute and significantly influence to the principals transformational leadership?; (2) do school organizational conditions to directly contribute and significantly influence to the principals transformational leadership?; (3) do work ethics contribute and significantly influence to the principals transformasional leadership?; and (4) in what way is principals transformational leadership model suitable to increase education quality of vocational high schools’ principals. This research design was confirmatory factor analysis approach was Structural Equation Model (SEM). The result of this study shows that school principal competence contributes (24,5%) and significantly influences to school principal leadership, school organizational conditions (29,4%) and significantly influences to principal transformational leadership, meanwhile the determinant factors including school principal competence, school organizational conditions and work ethics contribute (0,856%) and significantly influence. A suitable principal transformational leadership model to develop vocational high school quality is through school organizational conditions; work ethics; principal competence rights. Based on these findings, a school principal should be guided by the main principle when he performs his work, in order to have abilities and skills in managing his school effevtively; a principal should have work-culture to achieve an effective school organizational conditions; a principal should be able to increase a culture of work ethics for school members by enhancing their presence to always come at school; has commitment to develop his school, educational institutions should arrange the planning of principals training about soft skill entrepreneurship in order they have maximal work ethics in increasing the education quality at vocational high school.


ABSTRAK

Model kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah terbentuk dari berbagai asfek yaitu kompetensi, iklim organisasi sekolah dan etos kerja.Permasalahannya adalah apakah model kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah dikonstruk dari dimensi kompetensi, iklim organisasi sekolah dan etos kerja. Tujuan penelitian ini mencari model kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah di SMKN Tegal. Desain penelitian ini adalah berpendekatan confirmatory factor analysis. Jumlah sampel 200 dipilih secara proportional random sampling. Instrumen menggunakan “questionareâ€dengan reliability. Desain penelitian dengan paradigma kuantitatif, menjelaskan hubungan kausal variabel melalui uji hipotesis, dengan pemodelan persamaan structural (SEM). Hasil analisis menemukan kesesuaian model konseptual dengan model teruji bahwa kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah dipengaruhi secara signifikan oleh; kompetensi kepala sekolah (24,5%); iklim organisasi sekolah (29,4%); etos kerja (28,1%); Model faktor kompetensi kepala sekolah, iklim organisasi sekolah, dan etos kerja secara simultan berkontribusi terhadap kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah sebesar (85,6%). Implikasinya jika ingin meningkatkan kompetensi kepala sekolah, iklim organisasi sekolah dan etos kerja maka perlu dikembangkan model kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah dalam model yang teruji ini. Berdasarkan temuan, disarankan agar kepala sekolah, memiliki keterampilan manajerial, memperbaiki iklim organisasi sekolah dan peningkatan etos kerja kepala secara maksimal

Article Details

How to Cite
Hartinah, S. (2011). Model Kepemimpinan Transformasinal Kepala Sekolah SMK Negeri. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 17(1), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v17i1.4

References

  1. Howell, J.M., 1985. Transformational Leadership, Transactional
  2. Leadership, Locus of Control, and Support for Innovation: Key Predictors of Consolidated-Business-Unit Performance.
  3. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 Burns, J.M. and Aviolo. 1978. Charisma and Leadership in Organization. London: Sage.
  4. Boyatzis. R.E 1982. The Competent Manager. Wiley : Chichester.
  5. Burhanuddin 2004. Analisis Administrasi,Manajemen dan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
  6. Covey, Steven. 1992. Principle Centered Leadership. New York: Simon & Shuster.
  7. Delp, Dunphy and Stace, 1977. Under New Management. Reseville: Mc Graw-Hill.
  8. Dunphy and Stace 1990. Under New Management. Reseville: Mc Graw-Hill.
  9. Duncon. D.R 1972. “What is the Difference between Organizational Culture and Organization Climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars”. Academy of Management Review, July p619.
  10. Gaffar, M. F. 2005. Perencanaan Pendidikan: Teori dan Metodologi. Jakarta: P2LPTK Depdikbud.
  11. Ghozali, Imam 2005.Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro.
  12. Ghozali, Imam dan Fuad. 2005. Structural Equation Modeling: Teori, Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program Lisrel 8,54. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
  13. Hunt, J.G. 1991. Leadership: A New Synthesis. CA: Sage.
  14. Joreskog, K & Sorbon, D.2001. The Student Edition of LISREL 8.51 for Windows (Computer Software) Lincolnwood,IL:Scientific Software International, Inc
  15. Kartono, Tri Jaka.2006. Perencanaan Optimalisasi Peran Guru SMKN Teknologi didasarkan Faktor-faktor Determinasi Kinerja. Disertasi. Semarang :Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  16. Locke, Edwin A and Associates. 1997. Esensi Kepemimpinan: Empat Kunci untuk Memimpin dengan Penuh Keberhasilan. Jakarta : Spektrum.
  17. Mulyasa, Edward 2002 Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung : PT Remaja Rusdakarya
  18. Nurhadi, Mulyani A.2003. Pokok-pokok Pikiran Mengenai Pengelolaan Bidang Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan dalam rangka Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang RI No 22 Jakarta: Makalah Seminar
  19. Jalal, Fasli dan Dedi, S. 2008. Reformasi Pendidikan dalam Konteks Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: Adicita.
  20. Krajewsky, J Robert. 1983. The Elementary School Principalship. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  21. Pinnes.S. Goodman. Dan Pennings, J.M. 1992. New Perspective on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass
  22. Peraturan Pemerintah. RI No 13 1997 tentang Standart Kepala Sekolah /Madrasah Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  23. Peters, Robin, Steven 1992. Organizational Behavior: Concets, Controversies, Applications, 8th edition, CD-ROM version Prentice Hall.
  24. Sanusi, A. 2001. Pendidikan Alternatif. Menyentuh Arus Dasar Persoalan Pendidikan dan Kemasyarakatan. Bandung: PPs IKIP dan Grafindo Media Pratama.
  25. Siagian, Harbangan. 2006. Administrasi Pendidikan Suatu Pendekatan Sistemik. Salatiga: Satyawacana
  26. Sergiovanni,T.j.1987.The Principalship. A Reflective Practice Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon,Inc
  27. Spencer, Lyle M., Jr dan Signe M Spencer. 1993. Competence at work, Models for Superior Performence. John Willey & Sons.Inc.
  28. Steers, Richard M 1977. Organizational Effectiveness, A Behavioral View. Santa Monica California: Goodyear Publishing Company Inc
  29. Sinamo Jansen. 1999. Menciptakan Visi Motivatif (in Search of Powerfull Vision) Majalah Manajemen No 120 Agustus : 9
  30. Sillin, H. 1994. The Relationship between Transformational and Transactional Leadership and School Improvement Outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 272-298.
  31. Sergiovanni,T.J.1990.The Principalship. A Reflective Practice Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon,Inc
  32. Tjiptono, Fandy dan Dianan A. 2006. Total Quality Management Yogyakarta: Andi
  33. Wahjo Sumidjo. 2006. Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah. Tinjauan teoritik dan Permasalahnnya. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada