Article Sidebar

Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 5333 Download : 2741

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Pembelajaran STEAM berperan penting dalam pendidikan abad 21. Guru sebagai salah satu aspek kunci dari implementasi pendidikan memegang peran penting dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran STEAM. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplor implementasi pembelajaran STEAM di sekolah dasar dan tantangan apa saja yang dihadapi guru sekolah dasar dalam implementasi STEAM. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif deskriptif dengan metode survei.  Sebanyak 32 guru sekolah dasar daerah Jawa Barat dan Banten menjadi partisipan dalam penelitian ini. Proses pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui angket mengenai implementasi pembelajaran STEAM  dan tantangan pembelajaran STEAM. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa guru telah mengimplementasikan pembelajaran STEAM dengan mempraktikkan pembelajaran yang berpusat kepada peserta didik, pembelajaran dengan model inkuiri dan berbasis masalah, evaluasi, refleksi, kolaborasi, serta melaksanakan pembelajaran yang terintegrasi baik secara konten maupun keterampilan. Adapun tantangan yang diungkapkan guru dalam implementasi pembelajaran STEAM  adalah tantangan pedagogik, teknis, fasilitas, sumber pembelajaran STEAM  dan waktu pelaksanaan STEAM.  Dapat disimpulkan bahwa guru telah melaksanakan kegiatan pembelajaran yang mengarah pada pembelajaran STEAM. Akan tetapi, perlu diadakan pelatihan teknis untuk guru berkaitan dengan teknis implementasi STEAM dan penyediaan fasilitas penunjang terutama fasilitas berbasis teknologi untuk mendukung implementasi STEAM di sekolah dasar.

Keywords

implementasi STEAM pembelajaran pedagogik sekolah dasar

Article Details

How to Cite
Nuragnia, B., Nadiroh, & Usman, H. (2021). PEMBELAJARAN STEAM DI SEKOLAH DASAR : IMPLEMENTASI DAN TANTANGAN . Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 6(2), 187 - 197. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v6i2.2388

References

  1. Akran, S. K., & Aşiroğlu, S. (2018). Perceptions of teachers towards the STEM education and the Constructivist education approach : Is the Constructivist education approach preparatory to the STEM Education? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(10), 2175–2186. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.061016
  2. Amira, N. (2021). Development of written test instruments to measure basic skills of STEAM ( Science , Technology , Engineering , Arts , and Mathematics ) junior high school students on science concept. 6th UPI International Conference on TVET 2020 (TVET 2020), 520(Tvet 2020), 64–69.
  3. Arisanti, W. O. L., Sopandi, W., & Widodo, A. (2016). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa SD melalui project based learning. EduHumaniora| Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 8(1), 82–95.
  4. Bahrum, S., Wahid, N., & Ibrahim, N. (2017). Integration of STEM education in malaysia and why to STEAM . International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 645–654. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i6/3027
  5. Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2016). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 3125(June), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519167
  6. Cintia, N. I., Kristin, F., & Anugraheni, I. (2018). Penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 32(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v1i1.12808
  7. Clarke, M. (2019). STEM to STEAM : Policy and practice. The STEAM Revolution, 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89818-6_15
  8. Costantino, T. (2018). STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973
  9. Gross, K., & Gross, S. (2016). TRANSFORMATION: Constructivism, Design Thinking, and Elementary STEAM. Art Education 69(6), 36-43, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224869
  10. Hanifah, W., Subiyantoro, S., & Muzzazinah. (2020). Creative thinking skills in science lessons in elementary schools. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education (ICLIQE 2019), 397, 870–875. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.107
  11. Henriksen, D., Mehta, R., & Mehta, S. (2019). Design thinking gives STEAM to teaching: A framework that breaks disciplinary boundaries. In Khine M., Areepattamanil S. (eds) STEAM Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.007/978-3-030-04003-1_4
  12. Herro, D., Quigley, C., & Cian, H. (2019). The challenges of STEAM instruction: Lessons from the field. Action in Teacher Education, 41(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1551159
  13. Hunter-doniger, T. (2018). Art infusion: Ideal conditions for STEAM tracey. Art Education, 71(2), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2018.1414534
  14. Kartini, D., & Widodo, A. (2020). Exploring elementary teachers’, Students’ Beliefs and readiness toward STEAM Education. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v7i1.22453
  15. Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2018). Gathering STE(A)M: Policy, curricular, and programmatic developments in arts-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education Introduction to the special issue of arts education policy review: STEAM focus. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1407979
  16. Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2018). An investigation of teachers’ perception on STEAM education teachers’ training program according to school Level. Indian Journal of Public Health, 9(December 2019). https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01076.8
  17. Land, M. H. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317
  18. Leasa, M., Batlolona, J. R., & Talakua, M. (2021). Elementary students’ creative thinking skills in science in the Maluku islands, Indonesia. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.11244
  19. Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
  20. Mansour, N. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of STEM education: Possibilities and challenges. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.1.1.51-54
  21. Margot, K. C., Kettler, T., & Margot, K. C. (2019). Teachers ’ perception of STEM integration and education : A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 1–16.
  22. Milara, I. S., & Cortés, M. (2019). Possibilities and challenges of STEAM pedagogies. March 2020. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28652.31360
  23. Nicolescu, B. (2018). The transdisciplinary evolution of the university condition for sustainable development. In: Fam D., Neuhauser L., Gibbs P. (eds) Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education, 73-81. Springer, Cham.
  24. Nistor, A., Gras-Velazquez, A., Billon, N., & Mihai, G. (2018). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education Practices in Europe (Issue December). Brussels: European Schoolnet.
  25. Park, H. J., Byun, S. Y., Sim, J., Han, H., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of STEAM education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1739–1753. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a
  26. Psycharis, S. (2018). STEAM in Education: A literature review on the role of computational thinking, engineering epistemology and computational science. Computational STEAM Pedagogy (Csp). S. Psycharis Scientific Culture, 4(2), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1214565
  27. Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the Joy in the Unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school Science and Math Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z
  28. Rafiqa, S., Boeriswati, E., & Usman, H. (2020). Multimedia-based English language learning interventions programs for elementary grades. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, XII(III), 1251–1259. https://doi.org/20.19001.JAT.2020.XII.I3.20.2397
  29. Riyanti, E. D., Roshayati, F., & Purnamasari, V. (2020). The profile of elementary teachers ’ understanding in STEAM (Science , Technology , Engineering , Art , and Mathematics) Approach. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(4), 678–686.
  30. Rolling, J. H. (2016). Reinventing the STEAM engine for art + design education. Arts Education, 69(4), 4-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176848
  31. Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 20–27. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/51616/STEMmania.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  32. Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
  33. Sriyanto, S., Buchori, A., Handayani, A., & Nguyen, P. T. (2020). Implementation multi factor evaluation Process ( MFEP ) Decision Support System for Choosing the Best Elementary School Teacher. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(2), 97–102.
  34. Suwandari, S., Ibrahim, M., & Widodo, W. (2019). Application of discovery learning to train the creative thinking skills of elementary school student. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 4(12), 410–417.
  35. Talib, C. A., Bidayu, I., Rafi, M., Rajan, S. T., Wahidah, N., Hakim, A., Ali, M., & Thoe, N. K. (2019). STEAM teaching strategies in related subject. Education, Sustainability and Society (ESS), 2(4), 14–18.
  36. Taylor, C. P. (2016). Why is a STEAM curriculum perspective crucial to the 21st Century? 14th Annual Conference of the Australian Council for Educational Research, August, 89–93. https://link-springer-com.ezproxy1.library.usyd.edu.au/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-94-007-2150-0_212.pdf
  37. Thi, N., Khuyen, T., Bien, N. Van, Lin, P., & Lin, J. (2020). Measuring teachers’ perceptions to sustain STEM education development. Sustainability, 12(4), 1–15.
  38. Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). How school context and personal factors relate to teachers’ attitudes toward teaching integrated STEM. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 631–651.
  39. Wang, H., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1-13.
  40. Wei, W. K., & Maat, S. M. (2020). The attitude of primary school teachers towards STEM Education. Technology Education Management Informatics Journal, 9(3), 1243–1251. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93
  41. Yakman, G. (2010). What is the point of STE@M? – A Brief Overview. STEAM Education.
  42. Yunelia, I. (2019). Pengembangan Kurikulum Disarankan Berbasis STEAM. Medcom.Id. https://www.medcom.id/pendidikan/news-pendidikan/GNGjPaAK-pengembangan-kurikulum-disarankan-berbasis-STEAM